In this landmark work of journalism, Norman Mailer reports on the presidential conventions of 1968, the turbulent year from which today’s bitterly divided country arose. The Vietnam War was raging; Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy had just been assassinated. In August, the Republican Party met in Miami and picked Richard Nixon as its candidate, to little fanfare. But when the Democrats backed Lyndon Johnson’s ineffectual vice president, Hubert Humphrey, the city of Chicago erupted. Antiwar protesters filled the streets and the police ran amok, beating and arresting demonstrators and delegates alike, all broadcast on live television—and captured in these pages by one of America’s fiercest intellects. Praise for Miami and the Siege of Chicago “For historians who wish for the presence of a world-class literary witness at crucial moments in history, Mailer in Miami and Chicago was heaven-sent.”—Michael Beschloss, The Washington Post “Extraordinary . . . Mailer [predicted that] ‘we will be fighting for forty years.’ He got that right, among many other things.”—Christopher Hitchens, The Atlantic “Often reads like a good, old-fashioned novel in which suspense, character, plot revelations, and pungently describable action abound.”—The New York Review of Books “[A] masterful account . . . To understand 1968, you must read Mailer.”—Chicago Tribune From the Trade Paperback edition.

POLITICAL MEMES TRADE ACCURACY FOR REACH What spreads fastest online isn’t always what’s true. And most of us are helping it spread. In today’s political landscape, a single meme can reach millions of people before anyone checks whether the claim inside it is accurate. Images move faster than evidence. Outrage travels farther than nuance. And across the political spectrum, accuracy is quietly being traded for impact. This is the Integrity Gap. The Integrity Gap is a full-color visual field guide to the modern political meme. Using 99 real political memes as case studies, the book breaks down the hidden mechanics that make viral political content so persuasive—and so difficult to question, even when we sense something is off. What makes this book different is its method. The author built his framework by fact-checking political content he personally agreed with, not just content from the other side. The result is a rare and honest investigation that holds every side to the same standard. Each chapter dissects a specific persuasion mechanism at work inside real images: fabricated and misattributed quotes that borrow credibility from figures who never said them; fake or misleading headlines designed to feel authoritative; emotional framing that bypasses critical thinking; selective statistics and stripped context that turn partial truths into viral ones; and escalating rhetoric that gradually erodes the credibility of the people sharing it. Readers will come away with practical tools they can use immediately, including the 30-Second Meme Audit, the Reverse Lens Test, and the Escalation Ladder—frameworks for slowing down, spotting manipulation, and deciding when not sharing is the most responsible choice. The Integrity Gap is not a book about which political side is right. It is a book about how belief is shaped, how misinformation spreads, and how to take back control of what you amplify.